I have been wondering what it is about that day that has stayed in my mind. I can remember two events that made an impact (other than, of course, the sheer gruesome nature of the event). One positive, one negative. The story of Tukaram Ombale who pushed a mobile barricade into the street to stop the Skoda carrying Kasab and one other terrorist and taking them on with only his service pistol (I no longer remember if he was even armed). Ombale paid for it with his life but it snared for us the one surviving terrorist who has given us all the proof we need (if indeed it was needed) about Pakistani involvement (state or 'non state') in the plot.
The other news I remember is one of our 'captains' of industry Ratan Tata coming on TV looking exceedingly sour, whinging about poor infrastructure, poor intelligence, poor response, poor governance that led to this carnage. No word for the poorly armed Mumbai police doing the best they can under such circumstances, no word for the NSG. He commiserates with his guests, but spares nary a thought for all those who died at CST, who remain forgotten to this day. Three days later, as an afterthought he says his words should not be taken as a 'lack of appreciation for the various agencies that fought the terrorists'.
I have written about this earlier, but these thoughts come back to me -- how differently each of us reacts in a crisis.
2 comments:
Tukaram Ombale was not armed.
There was an all-faith prayer meeting at Gateway where only VIPs and their guests were allowed.
The number of deaths in CST station outnumbered those elsewhere.
Most of the dead were muslim migrant workers from Bihar. I wonder whether their murder would have been as unremarked if their ethnic and religious identities were different.
While not wishing to sound like Arundhati Roy, I think in this case the interest in the dead was probably more based on their economic status than on their religion. But I could be wrong.
Post a Comment